Another exhibition, another challenge to write. ”I thought
as I headed toward the Journal Gallery one rainy evening. It is always exciting
to see what artists are dealing with, what problems they are opening, what they
want to point out to their works and, ultimately, what kind of message they
want to convey to the audience with their exhibition, which functions as a
medium in contemporary society. Thinking about the future text of the Fog
exhibition featuring watercolor artist Chayim Shvarzblat, I decided to use his strategy of
highlighting the process of emerging artwork to draw a parallel with the way
the text was thought, and use it here as an opening line.
As indicated in the exhibition catalog, the author Chayim Shvarzblat examines the origin of art works found in certain museum
collections. However, on this occasion, I will concentrate on the exhibition
setup section and the issue of visual cues suggesting an overarching theme of
process and research. It is very interesting to study what is inaccessible in
most exhibitions and what remains hidden to the audience, that is, everything
that entails the process of preparing the exhibition (preparation of the
author's concept, production of works, communication with the gallery and
curators, elaboration of the bill of costs, text of the exhibition and catalog
design and similar to). We are used to visiting exhibitions with rounded
narratives that are transparently and clearly arranged in space. This
exhibition just rejects this kind of presentation and functions as a somewhat
more complicated puzzle for the observer, dragging him into the recently
mentioned part of the preparations, behind the main stage. The concept of the
author is based on the dialogue from which the installation exhibited in the Journal
Gallery emerges.
The name of Chayim Shvarzblat’s exhibition is clear as soon
as you enter the space - the haze is materialized in the form of a veil that
directs movement in space and at the same time encourages the play of the
visible and the invisible, as well as of what is partly hidden, "in the
fog". It is particularly interesting that the text of the exhibition is
actually a written conversation about particular artifacts, witnesses to the
fragments of history found in the museum. So, for example, a photo of a canvas
is in this case behind a misty canopy, blurring our eyes, potentially raising
the question of the authenticity and credibility of what we see. Another
example is the escaping of light from the picture frame with motifs from
Chinese tradition and art, which may indicate the elusiveness and fragility of
interpretation, especially in the relationship between history and art.

No comments:
Post a Comment